Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DATES AND ORDER (DOC 25) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the United States of America, claimants Tim Tran, Karen Chhan, Wilson Mobil, Inc., and their counsel of record, as follows: On July 26, 2012, the parties to this matter submitted their Joint Scheduling Report setting forth the various discovery, disclosure, and dispositive motion dates, as required pursuant to FRCP Rule 16(b), along with proposed tr
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DATES AND ORDER (DOC 25) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the United States of America, claimants Tim Tran, Karen Chhan, Wilson Mobil, Inc., and their counsel of record, as follows: On July 26, 2012, the parties to this matter submitted their Joint Scheduling Report setting forth the various discovery, disclosure, and dispositive motion dates, as required pursuant to FRCP Rule 16(b), along with proposed tri..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE SCHEDULING ORDER DATES AND ORDER
(DOC 25)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the United States of America, claimants Tim Tran, Karen Chhan, Wilson Mobil, Inc., and their counsel of record, as follows:
On July 26, 2012, the parties to this matter submitted their Joint Scheduling Report setting forth the various discovery, disclosure, and dispositive motion dates, as required pursuant to FRCP Rule 16(b), along with proposed trial and pretrial deadline dates;
The parties now jointly agree that to facilitate and complete full discovery and disclosure of said discovery, the discovery and disclosure dates currently set forth in the Joint Scheduling Report and the Court's Scheduling Order issued pursuant thereto should be extended approximately seventy (75) days;
Due to the Court's request to continue the settlement conference date to July 5, 2013, the parties wish the engage in a meaningful settlement conference prior to the expenditures required for extensive depositions of the parties, as well as for expert discovery;
Additionally, due to the press of business with the compounded schedule of counsel and the recent sequestration by Congress has made participating in full discovery financially limiting for the United States and therefore, extended discovery is necessary to allow the United States to determine how to fully litigate this case under such compromise;
The parties have engaged in meaningful discovery and preliminary settlement discussions have commenced;
That extension of the discovery dates will not affect the trial or pre-trial motion dates set forth in the Scheduling Order;
The parties hereby stipulate that the dates set forth in the parties' Joint Scheduling Report and in the Court's August 2, 2012 Scheduling Order (Doc. 15) should be changed to the following dates:
Discovery Event Current Date/Deadline Proposed New Date
Non-Expert Discovery May 15, 2013 July 30, 2013
Expert Disclosure June 3, 2013 August 19, 2013
Supplemental Expert July 8, 2013 September 23, 2013
Expert Discovery August 9, 2013 October 23, 2013
In the alternative, if it is the Court's preference that the parties stipulate to continue each and every date listed within the Scheduling Order the requested additional 75 days, a further amended stipulation shall be filed.
ORDER
All discovery dates currently set forth in the Court's August 2, 2012 Scheduling Order (Doc. 15) shall be rescheduled to those dates stipulated to by the parties, as set forth hereinabove.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
