Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. QBR BRAKE, INC., 2:13-CV-00090-KJM-CKD. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130425b81 Visitors: 2
Filed: Apr. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Apr. 24, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)] KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. TO THE COURT: Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("PLAINTIFF" or "CSPA"), and Defendant QBR Brake, Inc. ("QBR" or "DEFENDANT"), Parties in the above-referenced matter, stipulate as follows: WHEREAS , on or about November 8, 2012, CSPA provided DEFENDANT with a Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit ("60-Day Notice Lett
More

STIPULATION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE; ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE [FRCP 41(a)(2)]

KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.

TO THE COURT:

Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("PLAINTIFF" or "CSPA"), and Defendant QBR Brake, Inc. ("QBR" or "DEFENDANT"), Parties in the above-referenced matter, stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, on or about November 8, 2012, CSPA provided DEFENDANT with a Notice of Violations and Intent to File Suit ("60-Day Notice Letter") under Section 505 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act ("Act" or "Clean Water Act"), 33 U.S.C. § 1365;

WHEREAS, on January 16, 2013, CSPA filed its Complaint against DEFENDANT in this Court, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance v. QBR Brake, Inc., et al. (USDC, E.D. Cal., Case No. 2:13-CV-00090-KJM-CKD) and said Complaint incorporated by reference all of the allegations contained in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter;

WHEREAS, CSPA and DEFENDANT, through their authorized representatives and without either adjudication of CSPA's claims or admission by DEFENDANT of any alleged violation or other wrongdoing, have chosen to resolve in full by way of settlement the allegations of CSPA as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, thereby avoiding the costs and uncertainties of further litigation. A copy of the Parties' proposed settlement agreement ("Settlement Agreement") entered into by and between CSPA and DEFENDANT is attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated by reference.

WHEREAS, CSPA submitted the Settlement Agreement via certified mail, return receipt requested, to the U.S. EPA and the U.S. Department of Justice ("the agencies") and the 45-day review period set forth at 40 C.F.R. § 135.5 has been completed without objection by the agencies.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed to by and between the Parties that CSPA's claims, as set forth in its 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint, be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). The Parties respectfully request an order from this Court dismissing such claims with prejudice. In accordance with Paragraph 21 of the Settlement Agreement, the Parties also request that this Court retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties through September 30, 2015, unless the Agreement is terminated early in accordance with the terms thereof, for the sole purpose of resolving any disputes between the parties with respect to enforcement of any provision of the Settlement Agreement.

ORDER

The court having considered the foregoing, and also having reviewed the letter from the U.S. Department of Justice filed on March 8, 2013, HEREBY ORDERS that Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance's claims against Defendant QBR Brake, Inc. ("QBR") as set forth in CSPA's 60-Day Notice Letter and Complaint filed in Case No. 2:13-CV-00090-KJM-CKD, are hereby dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs, except as provided for by the terms of the accompanying Settlement Agreement.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain and have jurisdiction over the Parties with respect to disputes arising under the Settlement Agreement attached to the Parties' Stipulation to Dismiss as Exhibit A until September 30, 2015, unless the Agreement is terminated early in accordance with the terms thereof.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer