U.S. v. ROBERTS, 2:12-MJ-348 CKD. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130429654
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION AND EXCLUDE TIME DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. The parties agree that time beginning January 25, 2013 and extending through February 15, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Further, the Defendant consents to an extension of the time for preliminary examination until February 15, 2013. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d). The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court exclud
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION AND EXCLUDE TIME DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. The parties agree that time beginning January 25, 2013 and extending through February 15, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Further, the Defendant consents to an extension of the time for preliminary examination until February 15, 2013. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d). The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excludi..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR PRELIMINARY EXAMINATION AND EXCLUDE TIME
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
The parties agree that time beginning January 25, 2013 and extending through February 15, 2013 should be excluded from the calculation of time under the Speedy Trial Act. Further, the Defendant consents to an extension of the time for preliminary examination until February 15, 2013. Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d). The parties submit that the ends of justice are served by the Court excluding such time so that they may have reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). In particular, the time is required so that the government and Defendant may exchange information, including pre-indictment discovery, and analyze its importance to the case. The parties are discussing a pre-indictment resolution to the case. The parties submit that this interest of justice outweighs the interest of the public and the Defendant in a speedy filing of an indictment or information, in accordance with Title 18, United States Code, § 3161(b) and (h)(7)(A), and further that this good cause outweighs the public's interest in the prompt disposition of criminal cases, in accordance with Fed. R. Crim. P. 5.1(d).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
