Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. GUY, 1:12-cv-01591-LJO-BAM. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130514c81 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 14, 2013
Latest Update: May 14, 2013
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. Upon the Petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, including the Declaration of Revenue Officer David M. Lopez, it is hereby: ORDERED that the Respondent, KEITH E. GUY, appear before United States District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, in that Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on June 17, 2013,
More

[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: CIVIL CONTEMPT

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

Upon the Petition of BENJAMIN B. WAGNER, United States Attorney for the Eastern District of California, including the Declaration of Revenue Officer David M. Lopez, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the Respondent, KEITH E. GUY, appear before United States District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill, in that Judge's courtroom in the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, on June 17, 2013, at 8:15 a.m., and that Respondent show cause as follows:

1. Why Respondent, KEITH E. GUY, should not be held in civil contempt of this Court for his failure to comply with the Order filed December 12, 2012, directing Respondent to comply with the I.R.S. Summons issued on July 27, 2012.

2. Why the Respondent should not be incarcerated and ordered to pay a daily fine until he complies with the Order, and ordered to pay a compensatory fine to the United States.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within seven (7) calendar days after the filing of this Order, the Respondent shall file and serve a written Response to the United States' Petition Re: Civil Contempt of Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations Enforcing I.R.S. Summons filed December 12, 2012. Only those issues brought into controversy by the responsive papers and supported by declaration will be considered at the hearing on this Order, and any uncontested allegation in the United States' Petition Re: Civil Contempt of Order Adopting Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations will be considered admitted.

Respondent is hereby notified that a failure to comply with this Order will subject Respondent to possible further sanctions for contempt of Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer