Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

OYARZO v. TUOLUMNE FIRE DISTRICT, 1:11-CV-01271-LJO-SAB (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130521776 Visitors: 19
Filed: May 20, 2013
Latest Update: May 20, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION RE CONSOLIDATION OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT TFD'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HOCKETT'S, HUTCHINS', AND TURNER'S REPLIES TO PLAINTIFFS PREVIOUSLY FILED OPPOSITIONS LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED between Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart, by and through their attorney, Shannon Seibert of Seibert & Bautista, and Defendants TFD, Joseph Turner, Darlene Hutchins, Kenneth Hockett, an
More

STIPULATION RE CONSOLIDATION OF PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITIONS TO DEFENDANT TFD'S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, OR ALTERNATIVELY, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND HOCKETT'S, HUTCHINS', AND TURNER'S REPLIES TO PLAINTIFFS PREVIOUSLY FILED OPPOSITIONS

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED between Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart, by and through their attorney, Shannon Seibert of Seibert & Bautista, and Defendants TFD, Joseph Turner, Darlene Hutchins, Kenneth Hockett, and Brian Machado, by and through their attorney, J. Anthony Abbott of Mayall Hurley, A Professional Corporation, as follows:

1. Defendants Kenneth Hockett, Darlene Hutchins, and Joseph Turner will file one consolidated Reply not to exceed 25 pages to Plaintiffs' Consolidated Opposition to Kenneth Hockett's, Darlene Hutchins', and Joseph Turner's Motions for Summary Judgment; 2. Plaintiffs Benjamin C. Oyarzo and Nicholas Hart will file one consolidated Opposition not to exceed 50 pages to Defendant TFD's Motions for Summary Judgment filed separately against each individual Plaintiff; 3. Plaintiffs will file one consolidated Response to the Separate Statements of Undisputed Facts filed by Defendant TFD against each individual Plaintiff; 4. All deadlines for filing of oppositions and replies remain as previously stipulated to by the parties and ordered by the Court.

ORDER

The stipulation of the parties having been considered, and good cause appearing therefor,

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer