JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ALBRIGHT, CIV. 2:11-2260 WBS CMK. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130603697
Visitors: 7
Filed: May 31, 2013
Latest Update: May 31, 2013
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant's request to submit his motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the written briefs (Docket No. 22) is denied. See E.D. Local R. 230(g) (although the parties may stipulate to the submission of a motion on the briefs, the court may reopen the matter for oral arguments). If counsel for defendant wishes to appear by phone at the hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment set for June 3, 201
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Defendant's request to submit his motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the written briefs (Docket No. 22) is denied. See E.D. Local R. 230(g) (although the parties may stipulate to the submission of a motion on the briefs, the court may reopen the matter for oral arguments). If counsel for defendant wishes to appear by phone at the hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment set for June 3, 2013..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Defendant's request to submit his motion for summary judgment and opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the written briefs (Docket No. 22) is denied. See E.D. Local R. 230(g) (although the parties may stipulate to the submission of a motion on the briefs, the court may reopen the matter for oral arguments).
If counsel for defendant wishes to appear by phone at the hearing on the cross-motions for summary judgment set for June 3, 2013, he may file the appropriate written request to do so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
