BRIDGES v. HUBBARD, 2:09-cv-0940 TLN DAD P. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130610890
Visitors: 6
Filed: Jun. 06, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 06, 2013
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On March 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for the court to allow him to communicate with prisoners at other prisons. Under the mailbox rule, on May 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the pa
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On March 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for the court to allow him to communicate with prisoners at other prisons. Under the mailbox rule, on May 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the par..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
On March 26, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff's motion for the court to allow him to communicate with prisoners at other prisons. Under the mailbox rule, on May 5, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of that order. Local Rule 303(b), states "rulings by Magistrate Judges shall be final if no reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service of the ruling on the parties. . ." E.D. Local Rule 303(b). Plaintiff's request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order of March 26, 2013, is therefore untimely.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's May 5, 2013, request for reconsideration (Doc. No. 112) is denied.
Source: Leagle
