Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA v. ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, 2:12-CV-01380-MCE-KJN. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130611713 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 10, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION AND DOCUMENTS KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. The parties, by and through their attorneys, hereby request a continuance of Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("Allied") Motion to Compel the Deposition of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union") and the Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents currently set for June 11,
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF ALLIED PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION TO COMPEL DEPOSITION AND DOCUMENTS

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

The parties, by and through their attorneys, hereby request a continuance of Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company's ("Allied") Motion to Compel the Deposition of National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA ("National Union") and the Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents currently set for June 11, 2013 at 8:30 a.m. to June 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

Good cause exists to allow a continuance. The parties had believed they reached an impasse and the motions were filed. The parties have had continued talks and, through them, resolved most of the issues in dispute with regard to the respective Motions. The parties believe they have resolved the dispute with respect to the Motion to Compel the Deposition, although complete resolution may be impacted by the ability to resolve the issues with regard to the Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents. The parties have resolved most issues with regard to the Motion to Compel Further Production of Documents. There remains an issue as to the scope of production of the requested documents. The parties are hopeful that they will resolve the remaining issue on scope of production in the next day or two. However, because of the impending discovery deadline, the Parties seek to continue the hearing on the motions to June 20, 2013 pending resolution of the remaining dispute.

For these and other valid reasons, the parties respectfully request that the hearing of June 11, 2013 be continued to June 20, 2013.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is ordered that the hearing, currently set for June 11, 2013, is moved to June 20, 2013 at 10:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer