Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HUNTSMAN, 2:08-CR-00091-MCE. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130613748 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 11, 2013
Summary: AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL APPEARANCE; ORDER THEREON MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the parties and their respective counsel, Christiaan H. Highsmith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, representing plaintiff United States of America, and Tasha Chalfant, Esq., representing defendant Dayna Huntsman, that Ms. Huntsman's initial appearance on the petition for revocation of supervised release, currently scheduled for June 13
More

AMENDED STIPULATION REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF INITIAL APPEARANCE; ORDER THEREON

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED among the parties and their respective counsel, Christiaan H. Highsmith, Assistant U.S. Attorney, representing plaintiff United States of America, and Tasha Chalfant, Esq., representing defendant Dayna Huntsman, that Ms. Huntsman's initial appearance on the petition for revocation of supervised release, currently scheduled for June 13, 2013, be continued to July 18, 2013 for the following reasons:

1. On April 2, 2013, a petition for revocation of supervised release was filed with the Court based on two charges, including one new law violation in connection with Ms. Huntsman's arrest by the San Leandro Police Department for petty theft and grand theft. Prior to her arrest, Ms. Huntsman was observed selling gift cards believed to have been stolen and was found to be in possession of social security cards and credit cards of other individuals.

2. Ms. Huntsman's revocation hearing was set for April 11, 2013, but was continued to May 9, 2013 following a request by the parties. The Court again granted a continuance — to June 13, 2013 — based on defense counsel's unopposed request for additional time.

3. On June 5, 2013, the probation officer filed a superseding petition for revocation, which added three additional charges, including a new law violation following Ms. Huntsman's arrest by the Benicia Police Department for possession of drug paraphernalia, burglary, forgeries counterfeiting, receiving/buying stolen property, identity fraud, and fraud. Pursuant to the superseding petition, the Court ordered the issuance of a warrant and an initial appearance and detention hearing before a Magistrate Judge.

4. On June 5, 2013, the Attorney for the United States contacted the Solano County District Attorney's Office and the Alameda County District Attorney's Office. The Deputy District Attorney in Solano County assigned to Ms. Huntsman's case stated that Ms. Huntsman is scheduled for a preliminary hearing in Solano County on June 11, 2013. The Deputy District Attorney in Alameda County assigned to Ms. Huntsman's case stated that Ms. Huntsman is scheduled for a preliminary hearing in Alameda County on July 16, 2013.

5. Because the new law violates alleged in the superseding petition are predicated upon alleged state law violations, the undersigned parties request that the Court continue Ms. Huntsman's initial appearance on the petition for revocation of supervised release to July 18, 2013 so that Ms. Huntsman's underlying state law violations are resolved and so that the parties can work towards a global resolution of this matter.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Based upon the agreement of the parties, the Court adopts the proposed stipulation continuing the initial appearance on the petition for revocation of supervised release. That appearance is accordingly continued from June 13, 2013 to July 18, 2013. At 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom No. 7.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer