BELL v. UNITED STATES DEP'T' OF INTERIOR, 2:12-cv-01414 TLN JFM (PS). (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130617510
Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 13, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 13, 2013
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On May 17, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 2, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. ECF 79. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. On May 17, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 2, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. ECF 79. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law. Therefore,..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
On May 17, 2013, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 2, 2012, denying plaintiff's motion to appoint counsel. ECF 79. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 2, 2012 (ECF 57), is affirmed.
Source: Leagle
