Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FRAZIER v. REDDING POLICE DEPT., 2:11-cv-1351 AC P. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130626c97 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2013
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action. 1 On June 21, 2013, plaintiff filed a document entitled "motion for a TRO preliminary injunctive relief." ECF No. 107. In this document as in previous filings, plaintiff insists that he is being denied access to certain G.P.S. records. He asks that the court issue an order directing "the state parole" to provide plaintiff such records for September 26, 2010.
More

ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff is a prison inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action.1 On June 21, 2013, plaintiff filed a document entitled "motion for a TRO preliminary injunctive relief." ECF No. 107. In this document as in previous filings, plaintiff insists that he is being denied access to certain G.P.S. records. He asks that the court issue an order directing "the state parole" to provide plaintiff such records for September 26, 2010. Id.

Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on February 22, 2013. ECF No. 96. Plaintiff's opposition was filed on March 20, 2013, and includes a request to continue the motion because there is still a need for discovery. ECF Nos. 97-100. Defendants filed their reply on March 28, 2013. ECF No. 102.

On March 29, 2013, this court gave plaintiff an additional 60 days to supplement his opposition with additional evidentiary submissions because defendants had failed to provide plaintiff the requisite contemporaneous Rand notice with their dispositive motion. ECF No. 105. Plaintiff supplemented his opposition in a filing dated April 19, 2013. ECF No. 106.

The instant motion is both untimely and redundant. The court will consider plaintiff's oft-repeated concerns in its review of the pending summary judgment motion.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff's improper request for a TRO/preliminary injunctive relief (ECF No. 107) is hereby disregarded.

FootNotes


1. The parties have consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge in this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer