Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MILLER v. SWARTHOUT, 2:12-cv-01351-JKS. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130626d02 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 24, 2013
Summary: ORDER JAMES K. SINGLETON, Jr., District Judge. On March 20, 2013, this Court directed the parties to meet and confer in order to specify which evidentiary proceedings needed to be transcribed. 1 This Court further ordered the Respondent to procure the necessary transcripts and to report back to this Court on its efforts on or before April 19, 2013. 2 On April 19, 2013, Respondent filed a status report stating that it was in the process of obtaining the transcripts. 3 The transcripts have no
More

ORDER

JAMES K. SINGLETON, Jr., District Judge.

On March 20, 2013, this Court directed the parties to meet and confer in order to specify which evidentiary proceedings needed to be transcribed.1 This Court further ordered the Respondent to procure the necessary transcripts and to report back to this Court on its efforts on or before April 19, 2013.2 On April 19, 2013, Respondent filed a status report stating that it was in the process of obtaining the transcripts.3 The transcripts have not yet been lodged, and this Court has not received any further updates from the Respondent as to the status of those transcripts. On June 14, 2013, Miller filed a Request for Status of Transcripts.4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

Miller's Request for Status of Transcripts at Docket No. 28 is GRANTED. Respondent shall report back to this Court on its efforts to procure the transcripts on or before July 9, 2013.

FootNotes


1. Docket No. 26.
2. Id.
3. Docket No. 27.
4. Docket No. 28.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer