HATHERLEY v. PFIZER, INC., CIV. 2:13-00719 WBS CKD. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130628933
Visitors: 16
Filed: Jun. 27, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2013
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), because oral argument will not be of material assistance in deciding plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket No. 11), and defendants' motion to stay, (Docket No. 10), the court orders these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearings set for July 1, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. are hereby vacated, and the parties' stipulation to continue the hearings to July 29, 2013 (Docket No. 22) is rejected. IT IS SO ORDERE
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), because oral argument will not be of material assistance in deciding plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket No. 11), and defendants' motion to stay, (Docket No. 10), the court orders these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearings set for July 1, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. are hereby vacated, and the parties' stipulation to continue the hearings to July 29, 2013 (Docket No. 22) is rejected. IT IS SO ORDERED..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.
Pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), because oral argument will not be of material assistance in deciding plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket No. 11), and defendants' motion to stay, (Docket No. 10), the court orders these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearings set for July 1, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. are hereby vacated, and the parties' stipulation to continue the hearings to July 29, 2013 (Docket No. 22) is rejected.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
