Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

McPHEARSON v. IVES, 2:09-cv-1889 JAM DAD P. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130703846 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 01, 2013
Latest Update: Jul. 01, 2013
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. 636(c). 1 The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and finds that the above-captioned case should be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. HE
More

ORDER

DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.

Each of the parties in the above-captioned case has filed a Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).1

The undersigned has reviewed the file herein and finds that the above-captioned case should be reassigned and referred to the magistrate judge for all further proceedings and entry of final judgment.

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court reassign this case to the Honorable Dale A. Drozd. HENCEFORTH, THE CAPTION ON DOCUMENTS FILED IN THE REASSIGNED CASE SHALL BE SHOWN AS No. 2:09-cv-1889 DAD P.

I am the magistrate judge currently assigned to this case. I accept reference of this case for all further proceedings, including trial and entry of final judgment, by myself or such other magistrate judge as may be assigned.

FootNotes


1. Petitioner initially declined to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 2) but subsequently filed a signed consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (ECF No. 7).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer