KUNKEL v. DILL, 1:09-cv-0686 BAM P. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130806647
Visitors: 32
Filed: Aug. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On June 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to cancel the settlement agreement. Having conducted the settlement agreement, the undersigned should address plaintiff's motion. The transcript from the May 6, 2013 settlement conference has been ordered. It appears that plaintiff's primary reason for seeking to set aside the settlement is the delay in receiving payment. Ironically, the payment cannot
Summary: ORDER KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On June 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to cancel the settlement agreement. Having conducted the settlement agreement, the undersigned should address plaintiff's motion. The transcript from the May 6, 2013 settlement conference has been ordered. It appears that plaintiff's primary reason for seeking to set aside the settlement is the delay in receiving payment. Ironically, the payment cannot ..
More
ORDER
KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. On June 10, 2013, plaintiff filed a motion to cancel the settlement agreement. Having conducted the settlement agreement, the undersigned should address plaintiff's motion. The transcript from the May 6, 2013 settlement conference has been ordered. It appears that plaintiff's primary reason for seeking to set aside the settlement is the delay in receiving payment. Ironically, the payment cannot be processed until plaintiff signs and returns the paperwork forwarded to him by defense counsel. Therefore, any delay seems due to plaintiff's unwillingness to sign and return the papers. Nevertheless, the undersigned will address the pending motion once the court reviews the transcript from the settlement placed on the court record.
Source: Leagle
