Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. ARELLANO-RODRIGUEZ, 2:10-CR-00390-WBS. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130819647 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 16, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 16, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. STIPULATION The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Hearing on August 19, 2013. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the status conference until September 16, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. and to exclude time between Augus
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER VACATING DATE, CONTINUING CASE, AND EXCLUDING TIME

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

STIPULATION

The United States, by and through its undersigned counsel, and defendant, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for a Status Hearing on August 19, 2013. 2. By this Stipulation, the parties now move to continue the status conference until September 16, 2013, at 9:30 a.m. and to exclude time between August 19, 2013, and September 16, 2013, under Local Codes A, N, and T4. 3. The parties and agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following: a. On February 22, 2013, the Court ordered that the defendant be committed to the custody of the Attorney General for treatment and competency evaluation. On this date, the Court set this matter for a Status Conference on July 15, 2013. b. On April 1, 2013, the Court was informed by FCC Butner Complex Warden Craig Apker that the Bureau of Prisons would not be able to complete treatment and evaluation of the defendant until July 23, 2013. Warden Apker anticipated providing a competency report to the parties and the Court within 14 working days of the end of the treatment period. c. As of August 16, 2013, the parties have not received a copy of the report. The parties have not been able to ascertain a date certain for the preparation of the report, however, it is anticipated that the report will be provided to the parties in the next two weeks. d. The parties request that the Court continue the Status Conference until September 16, 2013, to allow the Bureau of Prisons sufficient time to complete the competency evaluation of the defendant and allow the parties sufficient time to review the competency report before the next appearance. e. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. f. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, within which trial must commence, the time period of August 19, 2013, to September 16, 2013, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Further, this time period is also excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(1)(A) [Local Code A] and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(4) [Local Code N]. 4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer