Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. SANDOVAL, 2:08-cr-0346 LKK AC P. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130827b02 Visitors: 25
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. On March 18, 2013, petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding in pro per, filed a motion attacking his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255. ECF No. 75. On June 4, 2013, the United States filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. ECF No. 80. Petitioner has not opposed the motion. The local rules provide: "Failure of the responding party to file a written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be dee
More

ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

On March 18, 2013, petitioner, a federal prisoner proceeding in pro per, filed a motion attacking his conviction and sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. ECF No. 75. On June 4, 2013, the United States filed a motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. ECF No. 80. Petitioner has not opposed the motion.

The local rules provide: "Failure of the responding party to file a written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion. . . ." Local Rule 230(1). Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file an opposition, if any, to the government's motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, for summary judgment. Failure to file an opposition will be deemed as consent to have the pending motion granted.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer