MOSQUEDA v. MARTEL, 2:11-cv-0745 TLN AC P. (2013)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20130906631
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 05, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 05, 2013
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 10, 2012, respondent filed an answer which references various lodged documents. The court has not received any lodged documents in this case. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, respondent must furnish the court with copies of relevant transcripts and appellate court briefs and opinions. Accordingly, IT IS
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 10, 2012, respondent filed an answer which references various lodged documents. The court has not received any lodged documents in this case. Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing 2254 Cases, respondent must furnish the court with copies of relevant transcripts and appellate court briefs and opinions. Accordingly, IT IS O..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On October 10, 2012, respondent filed an answer which references various lodged documents. The court has not received any lodged documents in this case.
Pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases, respondent must furnish the court with copies of relevant transcripts and appellate court briefs and opinions. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, within thirty days of the date of this order, respondent shall lodge copies of the documents referenced in the answer as well as any other documents of record helpful to the resolution of petitioner's claims.
Source: Leagle
