ORDER RE MANDATORY SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
Due to the retirement of the previously assigned magistrate judge, this action was reassigned to United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on September 5, 2013. On September 6, 2013, District Court Judge Anthony W. Ishii issued an order adopting findings and recommendations and setting aside default judgment against Defendants and this action was reopened. On September 10, 2013, an order issued setting the mandatory scheduling conference in this action. Accordingly, this order shall issue to inform the parties of the Courts requirements for the scheduling conference.
Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P.") requires the Court to enter a Scheduling Conference Order within 120 days of the date the complaint is served upon the defendant.1 Therefore, it is ordered that all parties attend a formal Scheduling Conference before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, in Courtroom 9 at the United States Courthouse, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, CA 93721.
Attendance at the Scheduling Conference is mandatory for all parties. Parties may appear by their counsel, if represented. If a party is not represented by counsel, they must appear personally at the Scheduling Conference. Only counsel who are thoroughly familiar with the facts and the law of the instant case and who have full authority to bind his or her client shall appear. Trial counsel should participate in this Scheduling Conference whenever possible. Counsel should plan to spend up to thirty (30) minutes in this Scheduling Conference.
A Joint Scheduling Report, carefully prepared and executed by all counsel/pro se parties, shall be electronically filed in CM/ECF, one (1) full week prior to the Scheduling Conference.
If any party fails to participate in preparing the Joint Scheduling Report, the non-offending party shall detail the party's effort to get the offending party to participate in the Joint Scheduling Report. The non-offending party shall still file the report one (1) full week prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference and shall list the non-offending party's proposed dates. Absent good cause, the dates proposed by the non-offending party will be presumed to be the dates offered by the parties. The offending party may be subject to sanctions, including monetary sanctions to compensate the non-offending party's time and effort incurred in seeking compliance with this Scheduling Order.
For reference purposes, the Court requires that the Joint Scheduling Report indicate the date, time, and courtroom of the Scheduling Conference. This information is to be placed opposite the caption on the first page of the Report.
Among other things, counsel will be expected to discuss the possibility of settlement. Counsel are to thoroughly discuss settlement before undertaking the preparation of the Joint Scheduling Report and engaging in extensive discovery. However, even if settlement negotiations are progressing, counsel are expected to comply with the requirements of this Order unless otherwise excused by the Court. If the entire case is settled, please promptly inform the Court, and counsel's presence, as well as the Joint Scheduling Report, will not be required.
Counsel may request that their attendance be by telephonic conference. If two or more parties wish to appear telephonically, counsel shall decide which will be responsible for making prior arrangements for the conference call and shall initiate the call at the above-designated time. Once all parties are on the line, the call should be placed to Judge Boone's chambers at (559) 499-5200. Additionally, counsel are directed to indicate on the face page of their Joint Scheduling Report that the conference will be telephonic.
Form and Contents of the Joint Scheduling Report
At least two (2) weeks prior to the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, trial counsel for all parties shall conduct and conclude a conference at a time and place mutually agreed upon. This should preferably be a personal conference between all counsel but, due to the distances involved in this District, a telephonic conference call involving all counsel/pro se parties is permissible. The Joint Scheduling Report shall respond to the following items by corresponding numbered paragraphs:
1. Summary of the factual and legal contentions set forth in the pleadings of each party, including the relief sought by any party presently before the Court.
2. A proposed deadline for amendments to pleadings shall be included. Any proposed amendment to the pleadings presently on file shall be filed by its proponent contemporaneously with the Scheduling Conference Report. If the matter cannot be resolved at the Scheduling Conference, the matter will be set as a motion to amend in accordance with the Local Rules of the Eastern District of California.
3. A summary detailing the uncontested and contested facts.
4. A summary of the legal issues as to which there is no dispute, e.g., jurisdiction, venue, applicable federal or state law, etc., as well as summary of the disputed legal issues.
5. The status of all matters which are presently set before the Court, e.g., hearings of motions, etc.
6. A complete and detailed discovery plan addressing the following:
a. A date for the exchange of initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) or a statement that disclosures have already been exchanged;
b. A firm cut-off date for non-expert discovery;
c. A firm date for disclosure of expert witnesses as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2);
d. A firm cut-off date for expert witness discovery;
e. Any proposed changes in the limits on discovery imposed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b); 30(a)(2)(A), (B); 30(d); or 33(a);
f. Whether the parties anticipate the need for a protective order relating to the discovery of information relating to a trade secret or other confidential research, development, or commercial information;
g. Any issues or proposals relating to the timing, sequencing, phasing or scheduling of discovery;
h. Whether the parties anticipate the need to take discovery outside the United States and, if so, a description of the proposed discovery;
i. Whether any party anticipates video and/or sound recording of depositions; and
j. Whether the parties foresee a need for a Mid-Discovery Status Report and Conference and, if so, a proposed date for conducting the conference.
The discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates by which all discovery must be completed. Discovery motions will not be heard after the discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing discovery deadlines. All of these dates should be considered firm dates.
7. Dates agreed to by all counsel for:
a. Filing non-dispositive and dispositive pre-trial motions with the understanding that motions (except motions in limine or other trial motions) will not be entertained after the agreed upon date, which shall be no later than ten (10) weeks prior to the proposed Pre-Trial Conference date.
b. Pre-Trial Conference Date. (This date shall be no later than forty-five (45) days prior to the proposed trial date.)
c. Trial date.
All of these dates should be considered firm dates. Dates should be set to allow the Court to decide any matters under submission before the Pre-Trial Conference is set.
8. The parties are encouraged to discuss settlement, and must include a statement in the Joint Scheduling Report as to the possibility of settlement. The parties shall indicate when they desire a settlement conference, e.g., before further discovery, after discovery, after pre-trial motions, etc.
9. A statement as to whether the case is a jury or non-jury case. If the parties disagree as to whether a jury trial has been timely demanded or whether one is available on some or all of the claims, the statement shall include a summary of each party's position.
10. An estimate of the number of trial days is required. If the parties cannot agree, each party shall give his or her best estimate. In estimating the number of trial days, the parties should keep in mind that this court is normally able to devote the entire day to trial.
11. Whether the parties intend to consent to proceed before a United States magistrate judge. Presently, when a civil trial is set before the district judges in the Fresno Division, any criminal trial set which conflicts with the civil trial will take priority, even if the civil trial was set first. Continuances of civil trials under these circumstances may no longer be entertained, absent good cause, but the civil trial may instead trail from day to day or week to week until the completion of either the criminal case or the older civil case. The parties are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction without adverse substantive consequences.
12. Whether either party requests bifurcation or phasing of trial or has any other suggestion for shortening or expediting discovery, pre-trial motions or trial.
13. Whether this matter is related to any matter pending in this court or any other court, including bankruptcy court.
Additional Requirements
1. Discovery Relating to Electronic, Digital and/or Magnetic Data. Prior to a Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, counsel should carefully investigate their respective client's information management system so that they are knowledgeable as to its operation, including how information is stored and how it can be retrieved. Counsel shall also conduct a reasonable review of their respective client's computer files to ascertain the contents thereof, including archival and legacy data (outdated formats or media), and disclose in initial discovery (self-executing routine discovery) the computer-based evidence which may be used to support claims or defenses. A party seeking discovery of computer-based information shall notify the opposing party immediately, but no later than the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference, of that fact and identify as clearly as possible the categories of information which may be sought.
2. Duty to Meet and Confer. The parties shall meet and confer regarding the following matters during the Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) conference:
a. Computer-based information (in general): The parties shall attempt to agree on steps the parties will take to segregate and preserve computer-based information in order to avoid accusations of spoliation.
b. E-mail information: The parties shall attempt to agree as to the scope of e-mail discovery and attempt to agree upon an e-mail search protocol. This should include an agreement regarding inadvertent production of privileged e-mail messages.
c. Deleted information: The parties shall confer and attempt to agree whether or not restoration of deleted information may be necessary, the extent to which restoration of deleted information is needed, and who will bear the costs of restoration; and
d. Back-up data: The parties shall attempt to agree whether or not back-up data may be necessary, the extent to which backup data is needed and who will bear the cost of obtaining back-up data.
Important Chambers' Information
The parties are directed to the Court's website at www.caed.uscourts.gov under Judges; Boone (SAB); Standard Information (in the area entitled "Case Management Procedures") for specific information regarding Chambers' procedures. Information about law and motion, scheduling conferences, telephonic appearances, and discovery disputes is provided at this link.
Should counsel or a party appearing pro se fail to appear at the Mandatory Scheduling Conference, or fail to comply with the directions as set forth above, an ex parte hearing may be held and contempt sanctions, including monetary sanctions, dismissal, default, or other appropriate judgment, may be imposed and/or ordered.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
