Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROSAS v. CITY OF FRESNO, 1:13-CV-00850 AWI-GSA. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20131004b08 Visitors: 4
Filed: Oct. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs Raul Rosas and Eva Rosas ("Plaintiffs"), Defendant County of Fresno ("Defendant County"), and Defendant City of Fresno ("Defendant City"), through their respective counsel, and ordered by this Court, that: 1) The Status Conference set for October 16, 2013, be reset to October 15, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. The rescheduling is necessary due to Defendant City's counsel's sc
More

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE AND ORDER

GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED between Plaintiffs Raul Rosas and Eva Rosas ("Plaintiffs"), Defendant County of Fresno ("Defendant County"), and Defendant City of Fresno ("Defendant City"), through their respective counsel, and ordered by this Court, that:

1) The Status Conference set for October 16, 2013, be reset to October 15, 2013, at 10:30 a.m.

The rescheduling is necessary due to Defendant City's counsel's scheduled oral argument before the Ninth Circuit at 9:00 a.m., on October 16, 2013.

ORDER

Based on the above stipulation, the status conference of October 16, 2013, is reset to October 15, 2013, at 10:30 a.m. Telephonic appearances will be permitted. Any party wishing to appear telephonically shall contact Courtroom Deputy Amanda Martinez.

Additionally, the parties shall file a stipulation and a proposed order agreeing to consolidate this case with I.R. et al., v. City of Fresno et. al, 12-cv-558 AWI-GSA. If no stipulation can be reached, the parties shall file a status report that outlines what attempts were made to reach a stipulation, as well as explain why no stipulation could be reached.

In addition, the parties are strongly encouraged to work together and file a stipulation setting new deadlines for the consolidated case. If a stipulation is reached and the proposed dates are reasonable, the Court will likely vacate the status conference. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement regarding the dates, each party shall submit proposed dates for the Court's review.

All of the above stipulations or other pleadings shall be filed no later than five days prior to the next status conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer