DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
The Acting Commissioner of Social Security hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in the above-captioned case until Congress has restored appropriations.
1. At the end of the day on September 30, 2013, the Appropriations Act that had been funding the Department of Justice expired and appropriations to the Department lapsed. The same is true for most Executive agencies, including the Social Security Administration. The Department does not know when funding will be restored by Congress.
2. Absent an appropriation, Department of Justice attorneys and employees of the Social Security Administration are prohibited from working, even on a voluntary basis, except in very limited circumstances, including "emergencies involving the safety of human life or the protection of property." 31 U.S.C. § 1342.
3. Undersigned counsel therefore requests a stay of proceedings until Congress has restored appropriations to both the Department of Justice and the Social Security Administration.
4. If this motion for a stay is granted, the Government requests that, when Congress has appropriated funds for the Department of Justice and the Social Security Administration, all current deadlines for the parties be extended commensurate with the duration of the lapse in appropriations.
5. Opposing counsel has authorized the undersigned counsel to state that there is no objection to this motion.
Therefore, although we greatly regret any disruption caused to the Court and the other litigants, the Acting Commissioner of Social Security hereby moves for a stay of proceedings in this case until Department of Justice and Social Security Administration attorneys are permitted to resume their usual civil litigation functions.
In light of the representation that plaintiff has no opposition thereto, defendant's motion for a stay of proceedings in light of lapse of appropriations (Doc. No. 14) is APPROVED AND IT IS SO ORDERED. The stay entered herein shall be lifted automatically upon restoration of appropriations without further order of the court. However, this order is without prejudice to a motion brought by plaintiff's counsel to lift the stay prior to the restoration of appropriations should the passage of time cause a meaningful hardship.