Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DAMRON v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., 1:13-cv-01160-LJO-SAB. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20131007600 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 04, 2013
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OCTOBER 15, 2013 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge. This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Toni Damron ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, with reference to the following facts: 1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant on June 25, 2013 in Tulare County Superior Court, Case No. 252363. 2. On Jul
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE OCTOBER 15, 2013 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.

This Stipulation is made by and between Plaintiff Toni Damron ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. ("Defendant") (collectively, "the Parties"), by and through their respective counsel of record, with reference to the following facts:

1. Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendant on June 25, 2013 in Tulare County Superior Court, Case No. 252363.

2. On July 25, 2013, Defendant filed its Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint in Tulare County Superior Court. The same day, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California.

3. On July 26, 2013, the Court set the Initial Scheduling Conference for October 15, 2013 at 9:15 a.m in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. Accordingly, the Parties' Joint Scheduling Report is due October 8, 2013.

4. On September 25, 2013, counsel for the Parties met and conferred pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

5. Lead counsel for Defendant, Robert B. Milligan, is unable to attend the currently scheduled Initial Scheduling Conference as a result of another hearing set during the same time.

6. Counsel for the Parties have conferred about the matter and counsel for Plaintiff has indicated that he does not object to seeking a continuance of the date for the Initial Scheduling Conference. Counsel agreed to propose that the conference be continued to October 18 or 24, 2013.

7. The Parties jointly request that the Initial Scheduling Conference be continued to October 18 or 24, 2013, or as soon thereafter.

8. The Parties jointly request that the Court maintain all related deadlines, including the October 8, 2013 deadline to file a Joint Scheduling Report.

9. The Parties have not previously requested a time extension in this case for any reason.

NOW THEREFORE, the Parties stipulate and jointly request that the Court continue the Initial Scheduling Conference from October 15, 2013 to October 18 or 24, 2013 at 9:15 a.m., in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, or soon thereafter as may be convenient for the Court. The Parties jointly request that the Court maintain all related deadlines, including the October 8, 2013 deadline to file a Joint Scheduling Report.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

After considering the Parties' Joint Stipulation to Continue the Initial Scheduling Conference, IT IS ORDERED that the current Initial Scheduling Conference scheduled for October 15, 2013 at 9:15 a.m. is continued to October 29, 2013 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 9 before Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all related deadlines shall remain unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer