Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. CHICO SCRAP METAL, INC., 2:10-cv-01207-GEB-AC. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20131023a48 Visitors: 2
Filed: Oct. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Oct. 22, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. WHEREAS, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("Plaintiff" or "CSPA") filed its Complaint in this action on May 17, 2010; WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint in this action on or about November 18, 2010; WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint in this action on or about December 10, 2010; WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to amend t
More

STIPULATION FOR LEAVE TO FILE THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER THEREON

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.

WHEREAS, Plaintiff California Sportfishing Protection Alliance ("Plaintiff" or "CSPA") filed its Complaint in this action on May 17, 2010;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its First Amended Complaint in this action on or about November 18, 2010;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed its Second Amended Complaint in this action on or about December 10, 2010;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to amend the Complaint by dismissing without prejudice the First through Fifth Causes of Action and the Eleventh through Fifteenth Causes of Action, and by adding a claim for failure to report non-compliance with the General Permit;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff has provided Defendants herein a proposed Third Amended Complaint (attached hereto as Exhibit A) which removes the First through Fifth Causes of Action and the Eleventh though Fifteenth Causes of Action, and adds a claim for failure to report non-compliance with the General Permit.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and among Plaintiff and Defendants, in the interest of judicial economy:

A. That Plaintiff shall be permitted to file its proposed Third Amended Complaint on October 21, 2013, or as soon thereafter as may be convenient for Plaintiff.

B. Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be electronically filed not later than thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files its Third Amended Complaint.

ORDER

Since the Parties have stipulated that Plaintiff be granted leave to file it proposed amended complaint, Plaintiff is granted leave to electronically file its proposed Third Amended Complaint until and including October 28, 2013. Defendants' response to the Third Amended Complaint shall be electronically filed not later than thirty (30) days after Plaintiff files its Third Amended Complaint.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer