Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

CALIFORNIA SPORTSFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2:13-cv-0847-JAM-EFB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130314b02 Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 13, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2014
Summary: ORDER EDMUND F. BRENNAN, District Judge. On March 5, 2014, defendant filed an ex parte request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's First Request for Inspection of Land and Property Pursuant to Rule 34 and plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. ECF No. 12; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 144. Defendant requests the extension of time to allow it to draft a motion for summary judgment and a motion for a protective order staying discovery pending r
More

ORDER

EDMUND F. BRENNAN, District Judge.

On March 5, 2014, defendant filed an ex parte request for an extension of time to respond to plaintiff's First Request for Inspection of Land and Property Pursuant to Rule 34 and plaintiff's First Set of Requests for Production of Documents. ECF No. 12; see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 144. Defendant requests the extension of time to allow it to draft a motion for summary judgment and a motion for a protective order staying discovery pending resolution of its forthcoming summary judgment motion. Plaintiff opposes the request.

Good cause appearing, it is ORDERED that defendant's March 5, 2014 request for an extension of time (ECF No. 12) is granted and defendant shall have until April 16, 2014 to respond to plaintiff's discovery requests.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer