Filed: Jan. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 07, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26 DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER GARIAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Steadfast Insurance Company, by and through its counsel of record, Jordon E. Harriman of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Defendants Reynen & Bardis Communities, Inc. and Upper Highlands Owners, LLC, ("Defendants") by and through their
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26 DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER GARIAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge. TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN: Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Steadfast Insurance Company, by and through its counsel of record, Jordon E. Harriman of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Defendants Reynen & Bardis Communities, Inc. and Upper Highlands Owners, LLC, ("Defendants") by and through their c..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) CONFERENCE AND EXTEND RULE 26 DEADLINES; [PROPOSED] ORDER
GARIAND E. BURRELL, Jr., District Judge.
TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES, AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD HEREIN:
Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Plaintiff Steadfast Insurance Company, by and through its counsel of record, Jordon E. Harriman of Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP, and Defendants Reynen & Bardis Communities, Inc. and Upper Highlands Owners, LLC, ("Defendants") by and through their counsel of record, Eric R. Garner of Wagner Kirkman Blaine Klomparens & Youmans LLP, stipulate and request as follows:
Four defendants (Reynen & Bardis Development (Nevada) LLC; Reynen & Bardis Communities (Nevada) LLC; Reynen & Bardis (Mt. Rose Estates) LLC; and Reynen & Bardis Construction (Nevada), Inc.) remain unserved. These defendants do not have agents for service of process, which would necessitate expending time and expense to serve them through the Nevada Secretary of State. However, counsel for the two answering defendants has agreed to accept service for the four remaining defendants as of January 6, 2014. The answers for these four defendants will consequently be due on January 26, 2014.
The Court has set a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for January 21, 2014. At that time, only two of the defendants will have appeared and be able to take part in the Conference. As such, the parties respectfully stipulate and request that the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference be continued for approximately 30 days, to February 18, 2014, or to such other date as the Court may set. The parties also stipulate and request that the current applicable deadlines under FRCP 26 and Local Rule 250 be continued to run from the continued Conference date. The appearing parties will timely file a Joint Report under Rule 26 for the currently scheduled Conference date.
No prior continuance of the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference has been requested or granted.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference, currently scheduled for January 21, 2014, is continued to March 3, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. A joint status report shall be filed fourteen days prior to the hearing.
