CONSERVATION CONGRESS v. U.S. FOREST SERVICE, 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140127769
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jan. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 23, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER 1 The parties have conferred and stipulate that oral argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be reset from the current date of February 13, 2014, to February 27, 2014. The parties have agreed to reset the oral argument date because of miscommunication between the parties reg
Summary: STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER 1 The parties have conferred and stipulate that oral argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be reset from the current date of February 13, 2014, to February 27, 2014. The parties have agreed to reset the oral argument date because of miscommunication between the parties rega..
More
STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, PROPOSED BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE AND ORDER 1
The parties have conferred and stipulate that oral argument on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss should be reset from the current date of February 13, 2014, to February 27, 2014. The parties have agreed to reset the oral argument date because of miscommunication between the parties regarding the availability of counsel for Plaintiff during the current hearing date of February 13, 2014. Counsel for Plaintiff has a previously scheduled family vacation during the current date of February 13, 2014. Counsel for Defendants has a deposition on February 27, 2014, at 10:00 a.m., but will be able to adjust the deposition schedule if this stipulation is granted. The parties respectfully request that they be placed first on the Court's argument calendar to accommodate this scheduling constraint.
The parties have also conferred and stipulate to the following briefing schedule on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss:
Plaintiff files a response in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss February 10, 2014
Defendants file a reply in support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss February 20, 2014
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
