Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

ROOTS v. COLVIN, 2:13-CV-01247-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140205998 Visitors: 21
Filed: Feb. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of January 27, 2014, by thirty days, to the new response date of Februa
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of January 27, 2014, by thirty days, to the new response date of February 26, 2014. This extension is requested because Plaintiff has a particularly heavy briefing schedule this month.

[proposed] ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE A REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a first requested extension of Plaintiff's time to file a Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.

Plaintiff shall file her Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment on or before February 26, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer