Filed: Feb. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDERSPEEDYTRIAL; FINDINGS AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants BRADLEY MCGRATH, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1) By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 2) By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until March 27, 2014, at 9
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDERSPEEDYTRIAL; FINDINGS AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants BRADLEY MCGRATH, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows: 1) By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 2) By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until March 27, 2014, at 9:..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDERSPEEDYTRIAL; FINDINGS AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendants BRADLEY MCGRATH, by and through his counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:
1) By previous order, this matter was set for status on February 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
2) By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until March 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. and to exclude time between February 27, 2014, and March 27, 2014 under Local Code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3) The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) The Government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes, to date, 50 pages of investigative reports and related documents in electronic form. All of his discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying.
b) Counsel for the defendant desires additional time to consult with his respective client, to review the current charges, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges, to review discovery for this matter, and to discuss potential resolutions with his respective clients.
c) Counsel for the defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d) The Government does not object to the continuance.
e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendants in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of February 27, 2014, and March 27, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at the defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial.
4) Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
