Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

CALIFORNIA SPORTSFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE v. MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., 2:13-CV-00847-JAM-EFB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140328944 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 27, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION STAYING DISCOVERY AND ORDER JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. On March 19, 2014, Defendant MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., ("MCM") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, on Plaintiff's Claims I-VI ("Motion for Summary Judgment"). The date of the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is calendared for Wednesday, May 7, 2014. Previously, on March 19, 2014, MCM filed a Motion for Protective Order seeking to stay all Discovery pending the resoluti
More

STIPULATION STAYING DISCOVERY AND ORDER

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

On March 19, 2014, Defendant MCM CONSTRUCTION, INC., ("MCM") filed a Motion for Summary Judgment, or, in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, on Plaintiff's Claims I-VI ("Motion for Summary Judgment"). The date of the hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is calendared for Wednesday, May 7, 2014. Previously, on March 19, 2014, MCM filed a Motion for Protective Order seeking to stay all Discovery pending the resolution of the Motion for Summary Judgment.

Counsel for MCM and Plaintiff CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE ("CSPA") have met and conferred regarding MCM's Motion for Protective Order, and have agreed to stay all Discovery pending the Court's ruling on MCM's Motion for Summary Judgment. This agreement has rendered MCM's Motion for Protective Order moot.

IT IS HEREBY AGREED AND STIPULATED by the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, that:

All Discovery is stayed in this matter pending the Court's ruling on MCM's Motion for Summary Judgment. Further, MCM's Motion for Protective Order shall be removed from the calendar as moot. Should the Court's ruling on the Motion for Summary Judgment eliminate the need for further Discovery, CSPA's requests for Discovery shall be rendered moot. Should the Court's ruling not eliminate the need for further discovery, MCM shall respond to CSPA's current Discovery requests within 21 days of the Court's ruling and order.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer