LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Judge.
READ THIS ORDER CAREFULLY. IT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DATES WHICH THE COURT WILL STRICTLY ENFORCE AND WITH WHICH ALL COUNSEL AND PARTIES MUST COMPLY. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION OF MONETARY AND ALL OTHER SANCTIONS WITHIN THE POWER OF THE COURT, INCLUDING DISMISSAL OR AN ORDER OF JUDGMENT.
Pursuant to court order, a Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference was held in chambers on March 24, 2014. Thomas P. Riley appeared telephonically as counsel for plaintiff; Curtis R. Namba appeared telephonically for defendants Joyce Ann Skinner and Larry Skinner; Matthew A. Pare appeared telephonically for defendants Brian M. Elia and Michael Elia. After hearing, the court makes the following findings and orders:
All parties have been served and no further service is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown.
No further joinder of parties or amendments to pleadings is permitted except with leave of court, good cause having been shown.
Jurisdiction is predicated upon 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1367, is undisputed, and is hereby found to be proper, as is venue.
All law and motion except as to discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be conducted so as to be completed by
At the time of filing a motion, opposition, or reply, counsel are directed to email a copy in word processing format to lkk-pleadings@caed.uscourts.gov.
The parties should keep in mind that the purpose of law and motion is to narrow and refine the legal issues raised by the case, and to dispose of by pretrial motion those issues that are susceptible to resolution without trial. To accomplish that purpose, the parties need to identify and fully research the issues presented by the case, and then examine those issues in light of the evidence gleaned through discovery. If it appears to counsel after examining the legal issues and facts that an issue can be resolved by pretrial motion, counsel are to file the appropriate motion by the law and motion cutoff set forth supra.
Where the parties bring motions for summary judgment, the court will deem facts which are apparently undisputed as undisputed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e), unless specifically reserved and that party tenders evidence to support the reservation.
Counsel are further reminded that motions in limine are procedural devices designed to address the admissibility of evidence. COUNSEL ARE CAUTIONED THAT THE COURT WILL LOOK WITH DISFAVOR UPON SUBSTANTIVE MOTIONS PRESENTED IN THE GUISE OF MOTIONS IN LIMINE AT THE TIME OF TRIAL.
No modifications of the discovery requirements found in the Federal Rules is ordered.
All discovery is left open, save and except that it shall be so conducted as to be
An expert witness not appearing on said lists will not be permitted to testify unless the party offering the witness demonstrates: (a) that the necessity of the witness could not have been reasonably anticipated at the time the lists were exchanged; (b) the court and opposing counsel were promptly notified upon discovery of the witness; and (c) that the witness was promptly proffered for deposition.
Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the close of discovery, all parties shall file with the court and serve on all other parties a brief statement summarizing all law and motion practice heard by the court as of the date of the filing of the statement, whether the court has disposed of the motion at the time the statement is filed and served, and the likelihood that any further motions will be noticed prior to the close of law and motion. The filing of this statement shall not relieve the parties or counsel of their obligation to timely notice all appropriate motions as set forth above.
The Final Pretrial Conference is
Counsel for all parties are to be fully prepared for trial at the time of the Pretrial Conference, with no matters remaining to be accomplished except production of witnesses for oral testimony. Counsel are referred to Local Rules 280 and 281 relating to the contents of and time for filing Pretrial Statements. In addition to those subjects listed in Local Rule 281(b), the parties are to provide the court with a plain, concise statement which identifies every non-discovery motion tendered to the court, and its resolution. A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES 280 AND 281 WILL BE GROUNDS FOR SANCTIONS.
The parties shall file Separate Pretrial Statements, the contents and timing of which are set forth in Local Rule 281, except that the parties are to prepare a
The undisputed facts and disputed factual issues are to be set forth in two separate sections. In each section, the parties should identify first the general facts relevant to all causes of action. After identifying the general facts, the parties should then identify those facts which are relevant to each separate cause of action. In this regard, the parties are to number each individual fact or factual issue. Where the parties are unable to agree as to what factual issues are properly before the court for trial, they should nevertheless list in the section on "DISPUTED FACTUAL ISSUES" all issues asserted by any of the parties and explain by parenthetical the controversy concerning each issue. Each individual disputed fact or factual issue shall include the following introductory language: "Whether or not . .. ." The parties should keep in mind that, in general, each fact should relate or correspond to an element of the relevant cause of action. If the case is tried to a jury, the undisputed facts will be read to the jury.
Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(10) and (11), the parties are required to provide in their Pretrial Statements a list of witnesses and exhibits that they propose to proffer at trial, no matter for what purpose. These lists shall not be contained in the Pretrial Statement itself, but shall be attached as separate documents to be used as addenda to the Final Pretrial Order. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be listed
Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(12), a party is required to provide a list of all answers to interrogatories and responses to requests for admission that the party expects to offer at trial. This list should include only those documents or portions thereof which the party expects to offer in its case-in-chief. Unless otherwise barred by a rule of evidence or order of this court, the parties remain free to tender appropriate discovery documents during trial for such purposes as, but not limited to, impeachment or memory refreshment.
Pursuant to Local Rule 281(b)(8), the parties' Pretrial Statements shall contain a "statement of legal theory, etc." Each party shall commence this section by specifying as to each claim whether federal or state law governs, and if state law, the state whose law is applicable.
Counsel are also reminded that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16, it will be their duty at the Pretrial Conference to aid the court in (a) formulation and simplification of issues and the elimination of frivolous claims or defenses; (b) settling of facts which should be properly admitted; and (c) the avoidance of unnecessary proof and cumulative evidence. Counsel must prepare their Pretrial Statements, and participate in good faith at the Pretrial Conference, with these aims in mind. A FAILURE TO DO SO MAY RESULT IN THE IMPOSITION of SANCTIONS which may include monetary sanctions, orders precluding proof, eliminations of claims or defenses, or such other sanctions as the court deems appropriate.
Trial is
A Settlement Conference will be set before a judge other than the trial judge at the time of the Pretrial Conference.
Counsel are cautioned to have a principal capable of disposition present at the Settlement Conference or to be fully authorized to settle the matter on any terms and at the Settlement Conference.
The parties are reminded that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), the Status (pretrial scheduling) Order
The parties are reminded of their continuing obligation to supplement their statements relative to the identification of parent corporations and any publicly held company that owns 10% or more of the party's stock within a reasonable time of any change in the information.
The parties are admonished that they are not to cite or refer to any of the quotations inscribed in the pavers on the front plaza of the United States Courthouse in any written or oral presentation to the court or a jury.
There appear to be no other matters presently pending before the court that will aid the just and expeditious disposition of this matter.