Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

OWNER-OPERATOR INDEPENDENT DRIVERS ASSOCIATION, INC. v. COREY, 2:14-cv-00186-MCE-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140331a15 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 28, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2014
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. On March 25, 2014, the parties stipulated that Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, be dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 26. The parties further stipulated that Defendants Corey and Nichols will remain as Defendants in their official capacities only and that Defendant Matt Rodriquez will also remain as a Defendant only in his official capacity. Id. Pursuant to
More

ORDER

MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.

On March 25, 2014, the parties stipulated that Plaintiffs' Complaint against Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, be dismissed without prejudice. ECF No. 26. The parties further stipulated that Defendants Corey and Nichols will remain as Defendants in their official capacities only and that Defendant Matt Rodriquez will also remain as a Defendant only in his official capacity. Id. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.1

On January 27, 2014, Defendants moved to dismiss Defendants Corey and Nichols in their personal capacities. Mot., ECF No. 21. In light of the parties' stipulations, ECF Nos. 26-27, Defendants' Motion, ECF No. 21, is DENIED as MOOT. See ECF No. 27 at 3 (¶ 5).

As set forth above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendants Richard W. Corey and Mary D. Nichols, in their personal capacities only, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

2. Defendants Richard W. Corey, Mary D. Nichols and Matt Rodriquez remain Defendants in their official capacities only; and

2. Defendant's Motion, ECF No. 21, is DENIED as MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Although the docket currently shows that all three individual Defendants, Corey, Nichols and Rodriguez, were named as Defendants in both their official and personal capacities, only Defendants Corey and Nichols were initially named in their personal capacities. See ECF No. 1 at 7-8, ¶¶ 24-26. Plaintiffs named Rodriguez as a Defendant in his official capacity only. See id. at 8 ¶ 26.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer