Filed: Mar. 31, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 31, 2014
Summary: ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR BRYANT SEAN HAYWARD (ECF No. 3) STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 11,2013, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and against Bryant Sean Hayward in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. (ECF No. 1-1.) On September 17, 2013, Plaintiff registered the foreign judgment in the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On March 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a
Summary: ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR BRYANT SEAN HAYWARD (ECF No. 3) STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge. I. INTRODUCTION On January 11,2013, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and against Bryant Sean Hayward in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. (ECF No. 1-1.) On September 17, 2013, Plaintiff registered the foreign judgment in the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On March 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a ..
More
ORDER FOR APPEARANCE AND EXAMINATION OF JUDGMENT DEBTOR BRYANT SEAN HAYWARD
(ECF No. 3)
STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.
I.
INTRODUCTION
On January 11,2013, judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and against Bryant Sean Hayward in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado. (ECF No. 1-1.) On September 17, 2013, Plaintiff registered the foreign judgment in the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) On March 28, 2014, Plaintiff filed a proposed order for Bryant Sean Hayward to appear for examination. (ECF No. 3.)
II.
DISCUSSION
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(1), "[t]he procedure on execution — and in proceedings supplementary to and in aid of judgment or execution — must accord with the procedure of the state where the court is located, but a federal statute governs to the extent it applies." "[T]he procedure on execution is to be in accordance with the procedure of the state in which the district court is located at the time the remedy is sought." In re Estate of Ferdinand Marcos Human Rights Litigation, 536 F.3d 980, 987-88 (9th Cir. 2008). In turn, California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.110 provides, in relevant part:
(a) The judgment creditor may apply to the proper court for an order requiring the judgment debtor to appear before the court, or before a referee appointed by the court, at a time and place specified in the order, to furnish information to aid in enforcement of the money judgment.
(b) If the judgment creditor has not caused the judgment debtor to be examined under this section during the preceding 120 days, the court shall make the order upon ex parte application of the judgment creditor.
(c) If the judgment creditor has caused the judgment debtor to be examined under this section during the preceding 120 days, the court shall make the order if the judgment creditor by affidavit or otherwise shows good cause for the order. The application shall be made on noticed motion if the court so directs or a court rule so requires. Otherwise, it may be made ex parte.
(d) The judgment creditor shall personally serve a copy of the order on the judgment debtor not less than 10 days before the date set for the examination. Service shall be made in the manner specified in Section 415.10. Service of the order creates a lien on the personal property of the judgment debtor for a period of one year from the date of the order unless extended or sooner terminated by the court.
(e) The order shall contain the following statement in 14-point boldface type if printed or in capital letters if typed: "NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR. If you fail to appear at the time and place specified in this order, you may be subject to arrest and punishment for contempt of court and the court may make an order requiring you to pay the reasonable attorney's fees incurred by the judgment creditor in this proceeding."
Cal Civ. Proc. Code § 708.110(a)-(e).
California Code of Civil Procedure § 708.160(b) also provides that "[a] person sought to be examined may not be required to attend an examination before a court located outside the county in which the person resides or has a place of business unless the distance from the person's place of residence or place of business to the place of examination is less than 150 miles." Cal. Civ. Proc. Code § 708.160(b).
The Court finds that Plaintiff has satisfied the requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 1963 because judgment in the amount of $390,569.12 has been entered by this Court. Additionally, Plaintiff's application sets forth the showing required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 69(a)(2) and the applicable provisions of the California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 708.110 and 708.160.
III.
CONCLUSION
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendant/judgment debtor Bryant Sean Hayward shall appear personally on Wednesday, May 28, 2014, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 9 of the United States District Courthouse, located at 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California, 93721, to furnish information to aid in enforcement of a money judgment by answering questions about the Defendant/judgment debtor's real and personal property; and
2. Plaintiff/judgment creditor must serve this order upon Defendant/judgment debtor Bryant Sean Hayward personally not less than ten (10) days before the date set for the examination and must file a certificate of such service with the Court.
NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR. IF YOU FAIL TO APPEAR AT THE TIME AND PLACE SPECIFIED IN THIS ORDER, YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO ARREST AND PUNISHMENT FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT AND THE COURT MAY MAKE AN ORDER REQUIRING YOU TO PAY THE REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES INCURRED BY THE JUDGMENT CREDITOR IN THIS PROCEEDING.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
