CONTRERAS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:13-cv-01237-JLT. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140402782
Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 01, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 01, 2014
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 11) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. On March 31, 2014, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file an opening brief. (Doc. 11). Notably, the Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), which has not been used by the parties. Accordingly, an extension of time is appropriate. Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPENING BRIEF (Doc. 11) JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge. On March 31, 2014, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file an opening brief. (Doc. 11). Notably, the Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), which has not been used by the parties. Accordingly, an extension of time is appropriate. Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: ..
More
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN OPENING BRIEF
(Doc. 11)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On March 31, 2014, the parties stipulated for Plaintiff to have an extension of time to file an opening brief. (Doc. 11). Notably, the Scheduling Order allows a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), which has not been used by the parties. Accordingly, an extension of time is appropriate.
Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The extension of time is GRANTED;
2. Plaintiff SHALL file an opening brief on or before April 28, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
