Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ROBINSON v. COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, 2:12-cv-2783 MCE GGH PS. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140407522 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2014
Summary: ORDER GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the court is plaintiff's March 11, 2014 motion to compel non-party EEOC's compliance with subpoenas. (ECF No. 45.) When the EEOC did not file a response to the motion, this court issued an order to show cause for the failure. Although the order was signed on April 2, 2014, it was docketed on April 3, 2014, after the EEOC filed its April 2, 2014 motion for leave of court to file its opposition. The EEOC has sufficiently provid
More

ORDER

GREGORY G. HOLLOWS, Magistrate Judge.

Presently pending before the court is plaintiff's March 11, 2014 motion to compel non-party EEOC's compliance with subpoenas. (ECF No. 45.) When the EEOC did not file a response to the motion, this court issued an order to show cause for the failure. Although the order was signed on April 2, 2014, it was docketed on April 3, 2014, after the EEOC filed its April 2, 2014 motion for leave of court to file its opposition. The EEOC has sufficiently provided cause for its failure in documentation indicating that it was not timely served with plaintiff's motion. The EEOC has also filed its opposition.1 (ECF No. 60.)

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The order to show cause, filed April 3, 2014, is discharged.

2. EEOC's motion for leave of court to file an untimely opposition to plaintiff's motion to compel is granted, and the EEOC's opposition is accepted.

3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve this order on counsel of record for the EEOC at the address indicated in its filing.

FootNotes


1. A joint statement will not be required for this motion.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer