REDFOX INDUSTRIES, INC. v. CARPENTERS 46 NORTHERN CALIFORNIA COUNTIES CONFERENCE BOARD, 2:13-cv-02176-TLN-KJN. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140411749
Visitors: 3
Filed: Apr. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board and Carpenters Local 46's (herein collectively referred to as "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss. ( See ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Redfox Industries, Incorporated's ("Plaintiff") Complaint was filed in response to an arbitration award in which the arbitrator found that Plaintiff was essentially the alter ego of a company called Miller Paneling. Plai
Summary: ORDER TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board and Carpenters Local 46's (herein collectively referred to as "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss. ( See ECF No. 6.) Plaintiff Redfox Industries, Incorporated's ("Plaintiff") Complaint was filed in response to an arbitration award in which the arbitrator found that Plaintiff was essentially the alter ego of a company called Miller Paneling. Plain..
More
ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court pursuant to Defendants Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board and Carpenters Local 46's (herein collectively referred to as "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss. (See ECF No. 6.)
Plaintiff Redfox Industries, Incorporated's ("Plaintiff") Complaint was filed in response to an arbitration award in which the arbitrator found that Plaintiff was essentially the alter ego of a company called Miller Paneling. Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from the legal implications of this award. Subsequent to the filing of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, this Court held that a related case, predicated on the same arbitration award, was not final and thus not correctly before this Court. See Miller Paneling Specialties, Inc. v. Carpenters 46 Northern California Counties Conference Board; Carpenters Local 46 (hereinafter Miller Paneling), No. 2:13-cv-01477-TLN-KJN, ECF No. 26.
Pursuant to the Court's order in Miller Paneling, the Court hereby orders the parties to provide supplemental briefing as to whether Plaintiff's claims are ripe. Such briefing shall be no more than ten (10) pages in length and shall be filed with the Court on or before April 25, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
