Carpenter v. Colvin, 1:13-CV-00984-SKO. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140416f32
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. The parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for Defendant to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment from April 8, 2014 to May 8, 2014. This stipulation is necessary because counsel for Defendant has been out of the office due to illness and needs additional time to review this case and draft a responsive pleading. The parties request this extension in good faith, wit
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. The parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for Defendant to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment from April 8, 2014 to May 8, 2014. This stipulation is necessary because counsel for Defendant has been out of the office due to illness and needs additional time to review this case and draft a responsive pleading. The parties request this extension in good faith, with..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; ORDER THEREON
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
The parties stipulate and agree, subject to the Court's approval, that the time for Defendant to file a Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment from April 8, 2014 to May 8, 2014. This stipulation is necessary because counsel for Defendant has been out of the office due to illness and needs additional time to review this case and draft a responsive pleading. The parties request this extension in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly. Counsel for Defendant apologizes for any inconvenience caused by this delay.
ORDER
The parties filed a stipulation that Defendant be granted additional time to file a responsive brief. (Doc. 17.)1 Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The Parties' stipulated request for an extension of time for Defendant to file a responsive brief is GRANTED;
2. Defendant shall file a responsive brief on or before May 8, 2014; and
3. Plaintiff may file an optional reply brief on or before May 26, 2014.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Although the parties indicate Defendant's responsive brief was due on April 8, 2014, the Court previously extended the briefing schedule and ordered that Defendant's responsive brief be filed on or before April 21, 2014. (Doc. 15.)
Source: Leagle
