BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Homer Tyrone Lewis ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 10, 2013, the Court screened Plaintiff's third amended complaint and found that it stated a claim against Defendants Alison, Adams, Junious, Denny, Parra and Garza for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. On December 23, 2013, the Court directed the United States Marshal to serve the third amended complaint on Defendants Alison, Adams, Junious, Denny, Parra and Garza. (ECF No. 25.)
On March 24, 2014, Plaintiff filed the instant request for entry of default against Defendant Adams. (ECF No. 28.)
On March 25, 2014, waivers of service were returned for Defendants Alison, Adams, Junious, Parra and Garza. The waivers were signed on March 20, 2014. (ECF No. 29.)
On April 1, 2014, Defendant Adams, along with Defendants Alison, Garza, Junious and Parra, requested a forty-five day extension of time to file a responsive pleading. (ECF No. 30.) The following day, on April 2, 2014, Defendant Adams filed an opposition to the motion for default. (ECF No. 31.)
Plaintiff moves for the Court to enter default against Defendant Adams. Entry of default is appropriate as to any party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought that has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and where that fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a). However, in this action, Defendant Adams appeared on April 1, 2014, when he requested an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, and on April 2, 2014, when he opposed entry of default. (ECF Nos. 30, 31.) Defendant Adams' appearance precludes any entitlement to entry of default or default judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55;
Additionally, a party may have the entry of default set aside upon a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(c). In determining if good cause exists to set aside the default judgment, "the court must consider three factors: (1) whether the party seeking to set aside the default engaged in culpable conduct that led to the default; (2) whether it had no meritorious defense; or (3) whether reopening the default judgment would prejudice the other party."
Here, if the Court entered default, it could easily be set aside.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff's motion for default, filed March 24, 2014, is DENIED;
2. Defendants' motion for a forty-five day extension of time to file a responsive pleading is GRANTED; and
3. Defendants shall file and serve a responsive pleading on or before May 1, 2014.