U.S. v. Gherasim, 2:12-cr-00388-MCE). (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140425605
Visitors: 5
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. With the Court's permission, defendant Daniel Gherasim and plaintiff United States of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 01, 2014; 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 31, 2014 and to exclude time bet
Summary: STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. With the Court's permission, defendant Daniel Gherasim and plaintiff United States of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 01, 2014; 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 31, 2014 and to exclude time betw..
More
STIPULATION REGARDING EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; FINDINGS AND ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
With the Court's permission, defendant Daniel Gherasim and plaintiff United States of America, by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on May 01, 2014;
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 31, 2014 and to exclude time between April 24, 2014 and July 31, 2014 under local code T4. Plaintiff does not oppose this request.
3. The parties agree and stipulate that the Court find that counsel for the defendant requires additional time to review the current charges, to review the extensive discovery, to conduct investigation and research related to the charges and to prepare to discuss the matter with his client.
4. The government does not object to the continuance.
5. Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed under the Speedy Trial Act.
6. For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. section 3161, et seq., within which the trial date must commence, the time period of April 24, 2014 to July 31, 2014, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) and Local Code T4 because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
7. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
