DUNIGAN v. HICKMAN, 2:11-cv-961-MCE-EFB P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140430986
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 29, 2014
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On April 3, 2014, this court denied petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, ECF No. 125, but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability at the time the final order was entered. See Rule 11(a), Rules Governing 2254 Cases. A court shall issue a certificate of appealability where the petitioner has shown "that reaso
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge. Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. On April 3, 2014, this court denied petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, ECF No. 125, but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability at the time the final order was entered. See Rule 11(a), Rules Governing 2254 Cases. A court shall issue a certificate of appealability where the petitioner has shown "that reason..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief District Judge.
Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On April 3, 2014, this court denied petitioner's motion for relief from judgment, ECF No. 125, but did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability at the time the final order was entered. See Rule 11(a), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases.
A court shall issue a certificate of appealability where the petitioner has shown "that reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further." Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003) (internal quotation marks omitted). Reasonable jurists could not debate that petitioner's motion to vacate the judgment lacked merit.
Accordingly, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of the Court is directed to forward a copy of this order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing on the docket of Case No. 14-15743.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
