ROBERTS v. BROWN, 2:11-cv-0474-MCE-DAD P. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140507811
Visitors: 14
Filed: May 06, 2014
Latest Update: May 06, 2014
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Defendants have filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 78) is granted; 2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment as well as their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before June 4, 2014; and 3. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court's discovery and scheduling order issued
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Defendants have filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 78) is granted; 2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment as well as their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before June 4, 2014; and 3. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court's discovery and scheduling order issued S..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Defendants have filed a second motion to modify the scheduling order. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' motion to modify the scheduling order (Doc. No. 78) is granted;
2. Defendants shall file their motion for summary judgment as well as their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on or before June 4, 2014; and
3. Except as otherwise provided in this order, the court's discovery and scheduling order issued September 23, 2013, remains in effect.
Source: Leagle
