Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NIEVA v. JIMENEZ, 1:13-CV-01549-AWI-GSA. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140515845 Visitors: 20
Filed: May 14, 2014
Latest Update: May 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION CONTINUING DATE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL TO MAY 22, 2014; ORDER THEREON GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs SANTOS DOLORES NIEVA and PETR DROZEN, Defendants/Cross-Complainants RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, JIMENEZ TRUCKING and YOUNG'S COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC., and Defendants /Cross-Defendants NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION a/k/a AMTRAK, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and BARBARA ANN NEU, through their designat
More

STIPULATION CONTINUING DATE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL TO MAY 22, 2014; ORDER THEREON

GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between plaintiffs SANTOS DOLORES NIEVA and PETR DROZEN, Defendants/Cross-Complainants RIGOBERTO FERNANDEZ JIMENEZ, JIMENEZ TRUCKING and YOUNG'S COMMERCIAL TRANSFER, INC., and Defendants /Cross-Defendants NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION a/k/a AMTRAK, BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY and BARBARA ANN NEU, through their designated counsel, that the parties require more time to execute and finalize documents related to the settlement and final resolution of the above-captioned actions, and will file a Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Dismissing the above-captioned actions on or before May 22, 2014.

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties set forth above (see Doc. 36 for a signed copy), the parties shall file a stipulation to dismiss this case on or before May 22, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer