Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. APPROXIMATELY $52,893.37 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 2:14-MC-00055-TLN-AC. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140528k21 Visitors: 3
Filed: May 27, 2014
Latest Update: May 27, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge. It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant David Zinnel ("claimant"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows: 1. On or about January 21, 2014, claimant David Zinnel filed a claim, in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the Approxim
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE

TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.

It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of America and claimant David Zinnel ("claimant"), by and through their respective counsel, as follows:

1. On or about January 21, 2014, claimant David Zinnel filed a claim, in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, with the Internal Revenue Service with respect to the Approximately $52,893.37 seized from Wells Fargo Bank account 1838449153, held in the name of David Zinnel (hereafter "defendant funds"), which were seized on November 5, 2013.

2. The Internal Revenue Service has sent the written notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to all known interested parties. The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the defendant funds under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimant has filed a claim to the defendant funds as required by law in the administrative forfeiture proceeding.

3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture within ninety days after a claim has been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of the parties. That deadline was April 21, 2014.

4. By Stipulation and Order filed April 22, 2014, the parties stipulated to extend to May 21, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

5. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish by agreement to further extend to June 20, 2014, the time in which the United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture.

6. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject to forfeiture shall be extended to June 20, 2014.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer