U.S. v. Hampton, 1:14-CR-00058. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140602870
Visitors: 9
Filed: May 30, 2014
Latest Update: May 30, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. The Defendant, DAVID EDWARD HAMPTON, by and through his attorney of record, Kyle J. Humphrey, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Brian Delaney, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The status conference in this matter is currently set for June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. 2. The defense is seeking a continuance of the status conference on the grounds that defense counsel is
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge. The Defendant, DAVID EDWARD HAMPTON, by and through his attorney of record, Kyle J. Humphrey, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Brian Delaney, hereby stipulate as follows: 1. The status conference in this matter is currently set for June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. 2. The defense is seeking a continuance of the status conference on the grounds that defense counsel is c..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUANCE OF STATUS CONFERENCE
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
The Defendant, DAVID EDWARD HAMPTON, by and through his attorney of record, Kyle J. Humphrey, and the United States of America, by and through its attorney of record, Brian Delaney, hereby stipulate as follows:
1. The status conference in this matter is currently set for June 2, 2014 at 1:30 p.m.
2. The defense is seeking a continuance of the status conference on the grounds that defense counsel is continuing investigation and continuing to discuss possible resolutions with the prosecuting agency. The discovery in this case is voluminous and complicated.
3. The defense is requesting that Mr. Hampton's status conference be continued to August 11 or August 18, 2014, at the convenience of the court.
4. The United States has no objection to the requested continuance and the dates selected. The dates were selected after consultation between the attorneys regarding the reason for the defense's request.
5. The parties agree that the time until the next status conference be excluded under the Speedy Trial Act for counsel availability and to preserve the interests of justice under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A).
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Status Conference date, currently set on June 2, 2014, at 1:30 p.m., be continued to August 18, 2014, at 1:30 p.m. Time is excluded through the date of the next Status Conference under the Speedy Trial Act, for the reasons set forth in the parties' stipulation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle