Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. KESSEDJIAN, 1:11-CR-00237 LJO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140610766 Visitors: 28
Filed: May 01, 2014
Latest Update: May 01, 2014
Summary: APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF RESTITUTION LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. WHEREAS, on April 14, 2014, defendant STEVE ZAVEN KESSEDJIAN was sentenced, among other things, to pay restitution in the amount of $72,259.62 to victims F.S. & C.S., M.S. and C.F. [Doc. 70]; WHEREAS, on April 14, 2014, in sentencing the defendant, the Court granted the United States ("government")'s request to release immediately funds on deposit in the Court's registry account (Case No. DCAE111CR00
More

APPLICATION AND ORDER FOR PARTIAL PAYMENT OF RESTITUTION

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2014, defendant STEVE ZAVEN KESSEDJIAN was sentenced, among other things, to pay restitution in the amount of $72,259.62 to victims F.S. & C.S., M.S. and C.F. [Doc. 70];

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2014, in sentencing the defendant, the Court granted the United States ("government")'s request to release immediately funds on deposit in the Court's registry account (Case No. DCAE111CR000237), then in the amount of $57,333.57, to be paid in partial satisfaction of restitution owed to victims F.S. & C.S., M.S. and C.F. [Doc. 70];

WHEREAS, the government has been unable to locate next of kin for victim C.F.;

ACCORDINGLY, the government applies for entry of an Order directing the clerk of the Court to release from the registry account in this case $5,160.00 to victim M.S., and the remaining funds ($52,173.55 and all accrued interest, representing approximately 91% of the total on deposit in the Court's registry account) to victims F.S. & C.S., in partial satisfaction of defendant's restitution obligation.

The clerk of the Court shall release from the registry account in this case $5,160.00 to victim M.S., and the remaining funds ($52,173.55 and all accrued interest) to victims F.S. & C.S., in partial satisfaction of defendant's restitution obligation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer