DRAPER v. ROSARIO, 2:10-CV-0032 KJM EFB. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140611b24
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 10, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 10, 2014
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On May 29, 2014, defendant lodged with the court the video recording of the September 9, 2009 interview with plaintiff, which was located only recently. If defendant seeks to introduce the video recording at trial set to begin June 16, 2014, he must be prepared to also make available for any questioning the court may allow the following persons: the officer who made the video, the attorney who certified that the video did not exist in response to plai
Summary: ORDER KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge. On May 29, 2014, defendant lodged with the court the video recording of the September 9, 2009 interview with plaintiff, which was located only recently. If defendant seeks to introduce the video recording at trial set to begin June 16, 2014, he must be prepared to also make available for any questioning the court may allow the following persons: the officer who made the video, the attorney who certified that the video did not exist in response to plain..
More
ORDER
KIMBERLY J. MUELLER, District Judge.
On May 29, 2014, defendant lodged with the court the video recording of the September 9, 2009 interview with plaintiff, which was located only recently. If defendant seeks to introduce the video recording at trial set to begin June 16, 2014, he must be prepared to also make available for any questioning the court may allow the following persons: the officer who made the video, the attorney who certified that the video did not exist in response to plaintiff's motion to compel (see ECF Nos. 70 at 3, 70-2 at 6), and the person who located the recording at CSP-Solano. These persons shall be made available promptly, if ordered by the court, on the first day of trial or any day of trial thereafter.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
