Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Coleman v. Green Tree Servicing LLC, 14-cv-00454-LJO-SKO. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140616853 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jun. 12, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REMAND TO STATE COURT LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge. Plaintiffs BRIAN COLEMAN and KARI ANN COLEMAN ("Plaintiffs") and defendant GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS Plaintiffs' original Complaint asserted causes of action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. ("FDCPA") and California Rosenth
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL OF THE FAIR DEBT COLLECTION PRACTICES ACT CAUSE OF ACTION WITH PREJUDICE AND REMAND TO STATE COURT

LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs BRIAN COLEMAN and KARI ANN COLEMAN ("Plaintiffs") and defendant GREEN TREE SERVICING LLC ("Defendant"), hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS Plaintiffs' original Complaint asserted causes of action under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq. ("FDCPA") and California Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ. Code § 1788, et seq. ("Rosenthal Act") (Doc. No. 1 at Ex. A.);

WHEREAS Defendant timely removed the Complaint to this Court based on federal question jurisdiction (Doc No. 1);

WHEREAS In response to Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule 12(b)(6), Plaintiffs filed a first amended complaint ("FAC") that omits the FDCPA cause of action (Doc. No. 8);

WHEREAS Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiffs and Defendant stipulate that the FDCPA cause of action is dismissed with prejudice;

WHEREAS Because the Rosenthal Act cause of action is the only remaining cause of action in the case, Plaintiffs and Defendant further stipulate and request an Order remanding the case to the Superior Court of California, County of Tulare, where the action was originally filed;

WHEREAS Defendant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the attached Order to respond to the FAC.

Based on the foregoing, it is hereby STIPULATED that:

1) Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the FDCPA cause of action is dismissed with prejudice;

2) The action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Tulare;

3) Defendant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the attached Order to respond to the FAC; and

4) Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the dismissal of Plaintiffs' FDCPA cause of action and the resulting remand to Superior Court.

ORDER

Based on the stipulation of the parties set forth above:

1) Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the FDCPA cause of action is dismissed with prejudice;

2) The action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of Tulare;

3) Defendant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of the entry of the attached Order to respond to the FAC; and

4) Each party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs associated with the dismissal of Plaintiffs' FDCPA cause of action and the resulting remand to Superior Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer