Raymond v. Colvin, 2:13-cv-02033-CMK. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20140618889
Filed: Jun. 17, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended fro
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective undersigned attorneys, with the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment in the above-referenced case is hereby extended from the present due date of June 9, 2014, by thirty days, to the new response date of July 9, 2014, and all other deadlines be extended accordingly. This extension is requested because Plaintiff has a particularly heavy briefing schedule this month.
ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties showing good cause for a requested first extension of Plaintiff's time to Reply to Defendant's Cross-Motion For Summary Judgment, the request is hereby APPROVED.
Plaintiff shall file her Reply on or before July 9, 2014.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
