Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MOORE v. SOLLEY, 1:14-cv-00617-SAB. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140619757 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 18, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS BALBIR SINGH DBA BELMONT U SAVE LIQUOR AND JASWANT SINGH DBA BELMONT U SAVE LIQUOR TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff and defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor and Jaswant Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that in order to provide sufficient time to resolve this matter through settlement, defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquo
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANTS BALBIR SINGH DBA BELMONT U SAVE LIQUOR AND JASWANT SINGH DBA BELMONT U SAVE LIQUOR TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

STANLEY A. BOONE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff and defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor and Jaswant Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor, through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate that in order to provide sufficient time to resolve this matter through settlement, defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor and Jaswant Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor shall have to and including June 30, 2014, in which to file a responsive pleading in the above-referenced matter.

This is the first extension agreed to by plaintiff and defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor and Jaswant Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor. The extension exceeds 28 days.

It is so stipulated.

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREOF,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendants Balbir Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor and Jaswant Singh dba Belmont U Save Liquor shall have to and including June 30, 2014, in which to file a responsive pleading in the above-referenced matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer