Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kalani v. Federico, 2:13-cv-00272-WBS-CKD. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140626930 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendant Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko's Caf ("Federico") and Defendant Highway 88 and 99 Land Company, a limited partnership ("Highway 88"), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that Plaintiff's Complaint in above-captioned ac
More

STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT; [PROPOSED] ORDER

WILLIAM B. SHUBB, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Robert Kalani and Defendant Ernest A. Federico, dba Perko's Café ("Federico") and Defendant Highway 88 and 99 Land Company, a limited partnership ("Highway 88"), the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), that Plaintiff's Complaint in above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party is to bear its own attorneys' fees and costs. Highway 88's Cross-Complaint against Federico will not be dismissed.

ORDER

The parties having so stipulated,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint in this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Each party shall bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Highway 88's Cross-Complaint against Federico is not dismissed.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer