Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

DIXON v. YATES, 2:10-cv-0631 JAM AC P. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140627885 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 26, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2014
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge. Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, proceeds on this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The previously filed Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 20, have been vacated and the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 8, has been denied. See Order, ECF No. 42 (adopting Findings and Recommendations at ECF No. 35). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Respondent is directed to file an answer to petitioner's habe
More

ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, proceeds on this application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The previously filed Findings and Recommendations, ECF No. 20, have been vacated and the motion to dismiss, ECF No. 8, has been denied. See Order, ECF No. 42 (adopting Findings and Recommendations at ECF No. 35).

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Respondent is directed to file an answer to petitioner's habeas petition within sixty days from the date of this order. See Rules 4 & 5, Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases;

2. Petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within thirty days after service of the answer;

3. Upon the filing of an answer and a reply (or expiration of time to file a reply), this matter will be deemed submitted.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer